Cite this article as:
Akbarova A. A. Interdependence of Harmoniousity of Valuable Orientations and Social Maturity. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2018, vol. 7, iss. 2, pp. 149-?. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2018-7-2-149-155
Interdependence of Harmoniousity of Valuable Orientations and Social Maturity
The paper presents the results of a correlation study, which purpose is to study the relationship between the harmony of value orientations and social maturity. As a hypothesis, it was suggested that the harmony of value orientations is closely related to various aspects of social maturity (social status, economic status, personal maturity). The empirical basis of the study consisted of 357 people (men and women aged 18–30 years, 178 women and 169 men). To collect empirical data, we used the methods based on a complex programme developed by A. B. Kupreichenko and A. L. Zhuravlev, and in the terms of the methods we studied self-assessment of social and economic status of the respondents, the level of their personal maturity, as well as their social activity. The social values of the respondents were investigated using the L. M. Smirnov’s method “Basic values and disvalues of the Russians”. As a result of the research, significant correlations were established between the low harmonious expression of the values of personal development and the high evaluation of one’s own opportunities for economic well-being and the development of personal maturity, as well as between the low harmony of the expression of values of social well-being and the high assessment of their social, economic status and the level of personal development. It is revealed that the achievement of social maturity by respondents is associated with the values of personal self-development more than with social well-being. It is established that there is a significant connection between the low harmony of the expression of the personal development values, the values of achieving individual benefits, relations with relevant others, and the manifestation of social activity: respondents who demonstrate low indicators of harmony in the expression of individual values show high social activity in socially significant life spheres
1. Gorbunova O. V. Sotsial’naya zrelost’ i cherty kharaktera lichnosti [Individual’s Social Maturity and Character Traits]. Samar. nauch. vestn. [Samara Journal of Science]. 2013, no. 4, pp. 54–57 (in Russian).
2. Aleksandrova G. G. Psikhologicheskie kriterii sotsial’noy zrelosti lichnosti v usloviyakh sovremennogo rossiyskogo obshchestva [Psychological Criteria of Personality’s Social Maturity in Present-Day Russian Society]. Uchen. zap. Kazan. un-ta [Proceedings of Kazan University. Humanities Series], 2007, vol. 149, no. 1, pp. 34–45 (in Russian).
3. Zhuravlev A. L. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya zrelost’: obosnovanie ponyatiya [Socio-Psychological Maturity: Problem Statement]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2007, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 44–54 (in Russian).
4. Degtyareva N. P. Razvitie obshchestvennoy aktivnosti studentov [Development of Students’ Public Activity]. Vestn. nauch. konf. [Bulletin of Scientifi c Conference], 2016, no. 10, pp. 39–40 (in Russian).
5. Soldatchenko A. L. Struktura i soderzhanie sotsial’noy zrelosti lichnosti: metodologicheskie podkhody [Personality’s Social Maturity Structure and Content: Methodological Approaches]. Vestn. Yuzhno-Ural. gos. un-ta [Bulletin of the South Ural State University], 2011, no. 3 (220), pp. 62–69 (in Russian).
6. Soldatchenko A. L. Kharakteristika sotsial’noy zreloy lichnosti s pozitsii interaktivnogo podkhoda [Description of Personal Social Maturity from Point of Interactive Approach. Ser. Obrazovanie. Pedagogicheskie nauki]. Vestn. Yuzhno-Ural. gos. un-ta [Bulletin of the South Ural State University], 2012, no. 14 (273), pp. 80–85 (in Russian).
7. Zhuravlev A. L., Kupreychenko A. B. Samoopredelenie lichnosti i gruppy: osnovnye priznaki i printsipy organizatsii issledovaniya [Person’s and Group’s Self-Determination: Basic Signs and Principles of Organization of Research]. Professional’noe i lichnostnoe samoopredelenie molodezhi v period sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoy stabilizatsii Rossii: materialy Vtoroy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Youth’s Professional and Personal Self-Determination in Period of Social and Economical Stabilization of Russia: Proceedinfs of the 2nd All-Russian Scientifi c and Practical Conference]. Ed. by A. V. Kaptsov. Samara, 2008, pp. 3–10 (in Russian).
8. Savva L. I. Soldatchenko A. L. Sotsial’noe vzaimodeystvie kak strukturnyy komponent sotsial’noy zrelosti studenta vuza [Social Interaction as Structural Component of Higher School Student’s Social Maturity]. Sovremennaya vysshaya shkola: innovatsionnyy aspect [Contemporary Higher School: Innovative Aspects], 2015, no. 4, pp. 147–153 (in Russian).
9. Gorbunova O. V. Sotsial’naya zrelost’ lichnosti budushchikh pedagogov-psikhologov: podkhody k opredeleniyu [Social Maturity of Future Teachers-Psychologists’ Personality: Approaches to Defi nition]. Baltiyskiy gum. zhurn. [Baltic Humanitarian Journal], 2014, no. 1, pp. 45–47 (in Russian).
10. Dermanova I. B., Manukyan R. V. Lichnostnaya zrelost’: k opredeleniyu psikhologicheskogo soderzhaniya [Рersonal Maturity and Its Psychological Content]. Vestnik S.-Peterb. un-ta, Ser. 12.Psihologiya. Sociologiya. Pedagogika [Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Ser. 12. Psychology. Sociology. Pedagogy], 2010, iss. 4, pp. 68–73 (in Russian).
11. Chernyshev A. S., Sarychev S. V. Psikhologicheskie osnovy sotsial’noy aktivnosti sovremennoy uchashcheysya molodezhi: sostoyanie i puti formirovaniya [Psychological Foundations of Modern Students’ Social Activity: State and Ways of Forming. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika]. Dobrovol’chestvo v sovremennom mire: nravstvennyy ideal nashego vremeni: sb. nauch. st. I mezhdunar. stud. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Volunteering in Modern World: Moral Ideal of Our Time: Collection of Scientifi c Papers of the 1st International Students Scientifi c and Practical Conference]. Kursk, 2016, pp. 188–194 (in Russian).
12. Arnett J. J. Emerging Adulthood: a Theory of Development from the Late Teens through the Twenties. American Psychologist, 2000, vol. 55, p. 469–480.
13. Greenberger E., Josselson R., Knerr C., Knerr B. The Measurement and Structure of Psychosocial Maturity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1975, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 128–141.
14. Zhuravlev A. L., Kupreychenko A. B. Ekonomicheskoe samoopredelenie molodezhi: struktura i determinatsiya [Economic Self-Determination of Youth: Structure and Determination]. Vestn. prakticheskoy psikhologii obrazovaniya [Bulletin of Practical Educational Psychology], 2007, no. 1, pp. 50–55 (in Russian).
15. Smirnov L. M. Bazovye tsennosti i antitsennosti sovremennykh rossiyan [Modern Russians’ Basic Values and Anti-Values]. In: Bazovye tsennosti rossiyan: Sotsial’nye ustanovki. Zhiznennye strategii. Simvoly. Mify [Russian’s Basic Values: Social Attitudes. Life Strategies. Symbols. Myths]. Eds. A. V. Ryabov, E. Sh. Kurbangaleeva. Moscow, 2003, рp. 16–26 (in Russian).
