Cite this article as:

Mekebaev N. S., Perevozkina Y. M. Теоретические основы структурных компонентов и детерминант ролевого взаимодействия курсантов: метасистемный подход. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2021, vol. 10, iss. 2, pp. 118-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-2-118-128

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Investigations of Psyche’s Development
UDC: 
316.37
Language: 
Russian

Теоретические основы структурных компонентов и детерминант ролевого взаимодействия курсантов: метасистемный подход

Authors: 
Mekebaev Nurzhan S., Novosibirsk Military Institute named after General I. K. Yakovlev of the National Guard of the Russian Federation, Novosibirsk , nursib84@mail.ru
Perevozkina Yulia M., Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Vilyuiskaya Str. 28, Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk Region, 630126 , per@bk.ru
Abstract: 

The relevance of the study is conditioned by changes taking place in the Russian Armed Forces, which are associated with the growth of military conflicts, with reforms and reorganizations in the structure of the National Guard, etc. Therefore, it imposes certain requirements on the professional training of the military personnel of the National Guard, who must fulfill several roles simultaneously and harmoniously integrate them into within their personality. The purpose of the study stated in the article is a theoretical analysis of the cadets’ role behavior, identification of conceptual avenues of theoretical and empirical research in this area, as well as justification of the metasystem approach in the study of the cadets’ role behavior. Presumably, the metasystem approach is applicable to modeling cadets’ role behavior. We used the following research methods: problemological analysis of military personnel role behavior, comparison of empirical studies on role behavior in the field of military psychology. It is shown that the theoretical analysis of military personnel role behavior reveals that all studies can be divided into three large groups that create conceptual foundations for understanding the problem. Firstly, a significant part of the study is devoted to the analysis of consistent integration of different roles into the structure of military personnel personality. Secondly, we scrupulously studied the determinants and correlates of military personnel role behavior. Thirdly, an important role is played by the research aimed at studying mental models of military personnel’s team work, as well as their impact on the effectiveness of mastering the role of a senior officer. We established that the problem of cadets’ role behavior can be viewed in the context of the metasystem approach, which reflects the specific regularities of social reality within the framework of the phenomenon under study. We showed that the role-based development of cadets is implemented within the multidimensionally organized system complex, functional components (culture, society and personality) of which have a common root and are ontologically inseparable.

Key words: 
role behavior, military personnel, mental models, senior officer
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-2-118-128
References
  1. Sluss D. M., Ashforth B. E. Relational Identity and Identifi cation: Defi ning Ourselves Through Work Relationships. Academy of Management Review, 2007, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 9–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20159278
  2. Parsons T. Social Structure and the Development of Personality. Psychiatry, 1958, vol. 21, iss. 4, pp. 321–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1958.11023143
  3. Giddens A. Four myths in the history of social thought. Economy and Society, 1972, vol. 1, iss. 4, pp. 357–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147200000020
  4. McCall G. J., Simmons J. L. Identities and Interactions. New York, The Free Press, 1966. 278 p.
  5. Perevozkina Yu. M. The Problem of Conceptualization Socialization in Role Theories. Yaroslavl Psychological Vestnik, 2020, iss. 1 (46), pp. 17–27 (in Russian).
  6. Kaspersen I. S. New societies, new soldiers? A soldier typology. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 2021, vol. 32, iss. 1, pp. 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2020.1785990
  7. Shibutani T. Reference Groups as Perspectives. American Journal of Sociology, 1955, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 562–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/221630
  8. Fedoseeva I. A., Perevozkina Y. M., Guparov M. M. Role structure of cadets with different social adaptability levels. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya – Perspectives of Science and Education, 2019, no. 39 (3), pp. 356–372 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2019.3.27
  9. Sypachev S. V. Status-Role Aspect of Social Certainty of Servicemen. Economical and Humanitarical Resrarches of the Regions, 2017, no. 2, pp. 90–94 (in Russian).
  10. Tryagin M. M. Interrelation of Indicators of Role Confl ict and Strategies for Overcoming Stressful Situations in the Activity of the Head of the Primary Team. Vestnik Universiteta, 2011, no. 8, pp. 108–109 (in Russian).
  11. Karpov A. V. Metasistemnaya organizatsiya individual’nykh kachestv lichnosti [Metasystem Organization of Individual Personality Traits]. Yaroslavl, YarGU Publ., 2018. 744 p. (in Russian).
  12. Karmazin T. I. Role behavior of cadets of military universities in the process of training. Sbornik nauchnykh statei MVOKU [Collection of scientifi c articles of the ICA], Moscow, Izd-vo Moskovskogo vysshego obshhe vojskovogo uchilishha, 2001. Iss. 15, pp. 106–117 (in Russian).
  13. Spirin A. V., Perevozkina Yu. M., Fedorishin M. I. Interdependence of role structuring and self-regulation of cadets from the position of the diachronic approach (Based on the material of the study of cadets of the NVI VNG of the Russian Federation). Chelovecheskiy faktor: Sotsialniy psikholog [Human Factor: Social Psychologist], 2020, no. 1 (39), pp. 432–443 (in Russian).
  14. Sivak A. N., Perevozkina Yu. M., Fedoseeva I. A. Predictors of subjective prosperity of cadets in the educational process of higher command school. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya – Perspectives of Science and Education, 2019, no. 38 (2), pp. 385–398 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2019.2.29
  15. Courtney L. G., Dennis R. K., Morten G. E., Michael D. M. Character strengths and performance outcomes among military brat and non-brat cadets. Military Psychology, 2020, vol. 32, iss. 2, pp. 186–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2019.1703434
  16. Chacko M. A. English-Educated as ‘Ready-Made’ Leaders: Re-Inscribing Distinction through the Student Police Cadet Project in Kerala, India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 2020, vol. 43, iss. 4, pp. 775–792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2020.1775356
  17. Boyce L. A., Herd A. M. The Relationship Between Gender Role Stereotypes and Requisite Military Leadership Characteristics. Sex Roles, 2003, no. 49, pp. 365–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025164221364
  18. Adelheid A. M., Charbonneau D. C., Boies K. Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation in a Ca nadian Military Sample. Military Psychology, 2007, vol. 19, iss. 4, pp. 239–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08995600701548072
  19. Shamionov R. M., Nikitenko P. D. Parity of Identity and Representations about the World in the Cource of Professional Socialization of Cadets of Military High School. Academic Articles of Pedagogical Institute. 2008. Ser. Psychology. Pedagogics, 2008, vol. 1, no. 3–4, pp. 48–54 (in Russian).
  20. Shamionov R. M., Sorokin A. I. The Role of Military Identity, Values and Satisfaction with the Military Service in Responsibility Formation of Cadets. Izv. Saratov Univ. ( N. S.), Ser. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2020, vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 25–32 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-1-25-32
  21. Pastor Álvarez A., Molero Alonso F., Bardera Mora М. P., Moriano León J. A. Authentic leadership and its relationships with work engagement and organizational citizenship behaviors in military units: The role of identifi cation as a mediating variable. Military Psychology, 2019, vol. 31, iss. 5, pp. 412–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2019.1646078
  22. Broesder W. A., Op den Buijs T. P., Vogelaar A. L. W., Euwema M. C. Can Soldiers Combine Swords and Pploughshares?: The Construction of the Warrior–Peacekeeper Role Identity Survey (WPRIS). Armed Forces & Society, 2015, vol. 41, iss. 3, pp. 519–540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X14539326
  23. Spirin A. V., Perevozkina Yu. M., Fedorishin M. I. To the question of determining value as a determinant of selfregulation in the situation of role interaction of a person. SMALTA, 2020, no. 1, pp. 32–39 (in Russian).
  24. Matthews M. D., Eid J., Kelly D., Bailey J. K. S., Peterson C. Character Strengths and Virtues of Developing Military Leaders: An International Comparison. Military Psychology, 2006, vol. 18, iss. 1, pp. 57–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp1803s_5
  25. Guseva N. B. Professional role self-determination of cadets of educational institutions of the MIA of Russia. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2006, no. 4 (32). pp. 402-405 (in Russian).
  26. Hackman J. R. The design of work teams. In: J. M. Lorsch, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1987, pp. 315–342.
  27. Shamir B., Brainin E., Zakay E., Popper M. Perceived Combat Readiness as Collective Effi cacy: Individual- and Group-Level Analysis. Military Psychology, 2000, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 105–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327876MP1202_2
  28. Kraiger K., Wenzel L. H. Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared mental models as indicators of team effectiveness. In: M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, C. W. Prince, eds. Team Performance Assessment and Measurement. Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York, London, Psychology Press, 1997, pp. 63–84.
  29. Cannon-Bowers J. A., Salas E., Converse S. Shared Mental Models in Expert Team Decision Making. In: N. J. Castellan, ed. Individual and Group Decision Making. Hillsdale, Lorence Erlbaum, 1993, pp. 221–246.
  30. Mathieu J. E., Heffner T. S., Goodwin G. F., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J. A. The infl uence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 273–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
  31. Boies K., Howell J. M. Leading Military Teams to Think and Feel: Exploring the Relations Between Leadership, Soldiers’ Cognitive and Affective Processes, and Team Effectiveness. Military Psychology, 2009, vol. 21, iss. 2, pp. 216–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08995600902768743
  32. Karpov A. V. Structural-level organization of individual personality qualities. Yaroslavl Psychological Vestnik, 2020, iss. 2 (47), pp. 6–13 (in Russia).
  33. Banton M. Roles: An Introduction to the Study of Social Relations. New York, Basic Books, 1965. 224 p.
  34. Lukyanov O. V. Existential analysis and the nature of time. Transtemporal nature of existential experience. Tomsk State University Journal, 2007, no. 299, pp. 164–170 (in Russia).
  35. Jones T. M. Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review, 1991, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 366–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958
  36. Fischer P., Krueger J. I., Greitemeyer T., Vogrincic C., Kastenmüller A., Frey D., Heene M., Wicher V., Kainbacher M. The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 2011, vol. 137, iss. 4, pp. 517–537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023304
Full text (in Russian):
download
(downloads: 91)
Short text (in English):
download
(downloads: 37)
© 2013-2025 Website design. Saratov State University