Cite this article as:

Belozerova L. A., Polyakov S. D. Transformation of the cognitive sphere of “digital generation” children: Experience analysis. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2021, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 23-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-1-23-32

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Investigations of Psyche’s Development
UDC: 
159 .92
Language: 
Russian

Transformation of the cognitive sphere of “digital generation” children: Experience analysis

Authors: 
Belozerova Lilia A., Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University named after IN Ulyanov, 432700 Ulyanovsk, the area of the 100th anniversary of the birth of Lenin, house 4. , bla-130880@yandex.ru
Polyakov Sergey D., Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University named after IN Ulyanov, 432700 Ulyanovsk, the area of the 100th anniversary of the birth of Lenin, house 4. , sdpolyakov@mail.ru
Abstract: 

The article studies the problem of changes in the cognitive sphere of children and adolescents of the digital generation – “generation Z” – in the context of influence of socio-cultural processes and digital technologies on the human psyche. We analyse data and models of changes in perception, thinking, memory and attention in the process of transformation of the socio-cultural situation. Arguments are given in favor of the standpoint emphasizing the ambiguous nature of the influence of digital technologies on the cognitive development of a modern person. The study has pointed out that this ambiguity is manifested both through the deficit in the development of “classical” cognitive mechanisms, and in the generation of new cultural tools (according to L.S. Vygotsky) that help a young person to adapt to the reality of the modern socio-cultural situation. We raise the problem of correlating the language of “classical” psychology of cognitive processes and cognitive characteristics of young people, which are observed in new linguistic forms. Furthermore, we consider the thesis regarding consideration of psychological characteristics of “generation Z” as a relatively universal one. It is argued that the data on modern adolescents cited in the studies should be interpreted as features of the most sensitive part of the birth cohort to the “digital onset”. We consider the place of the given analysis in solving the problem of education individualization in relation to psychological and pedagogical characteristics of adolescents, described as “generation Z”, and modern educational technologies.

Key words: 
“generation Z”, cognitive sphere, influence of digital technologies, socio-cultural transformations, information visualization, mosaic thinking, multitasking
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-1-23-32
References
  1. Mannheim K. The Problem of Generations (trans. from Engl. V. A. Plungian, A. Yu. Urmanchieva). Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye [New Literary Review], 1998, no. 30, pp. 7–47 (in Russian).
  2. Shamis E., Antipov A. Teoriya pokoleniy (Theory of generations). Available at: https://www.psycho.ru/library/2581 (accessed 9 August 2019) (in Russian).
  3. Howe N., Strauss W. Generations: The History of Americas Future. 1584 to 2069. New York, Quill William Morrow, 1991. 544 p.
  4. Prensky M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. Part 1. On the Horizon, 2001, vol. 9, iss. 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816. Available at: http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives%20 Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf (accessed 4 February 2018).
  5. Prensky M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. Part II: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 2001, vol. 9, iss. 6, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1108/10748120110424843. Available at: http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky% 20-%20Digital%20Natives%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part2.pdf (accessed 4 June 2018).
  6. Tapscott D. Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World. New York, McGraw-Hill Companies. 2008. 384 p. Available at: http://socium.ge/downloads/komunikaciisteoria/eng/Grown_Up_Digital_-_How... 28Don_Tapscott% 29.pdf (accessed 16 September 2018).
  7. Bezbogova M. S., Iontseva M. V. Socio-psychological portrait of modern youth. World of Science. Online Journal, 2016, vol. 4, no. 6 (in Russian). Available at: http://mirnauki.com/PDF/35PSMN616.pdf (accessed 27 January 2020).
  8. Godik Yu.O. “Digital Generation” and New Media. MediaScope, 2011, no. 2 (in Russian). Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/node/838 (accessed 10 August 2020).
  9. Dimuhametov R. S. Digital Natives ... What are They? Health Care, Education and Security, 2016, no. 1 (5), pp. 88–96 (in Russian).
  10. Rothman D. A Tsunami of Learners Called Generation Z. Available at: http://mdle.net/Journal/A_Tsunami_of_Learners_Called_Generation_Z.pdf (accessed 23 December 2019).
  11. Bogacheva N. V., Sivak E. V. Myths of “Generation Z”. Modern Education Analytics, 2019, no. 1 (22), pp. 1‒64 (in Russian).
  12. Golubinskaya A. V. Neurocognitive Approach to Generation Z Research. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2016, no. 1, vol. 1, pp. 161–167 (in Russian).
  13. Kolin K. K. Information anthropology: Next generation and the new threat of psychological stratifi cation of humanity in the information society. Herald of the Chelyabinsk State Academy of Culture and Arts, 2011, no. 4 (28), pp. 32–36 (in Russian).
  14. Lysak I. V., Belov D. P. The infl uence of information and communication technologies on peculiarities of cognitive processes. Izvestiya SFedU. Enginering Science, 2013, no. 5 (142), pp. 256–264 (in Russian).
  15. Soldatova G. U., Rasskazova E. I., Nestik T. A. Tsifrovoye pokoleniye Rossii: kompetentnost′ i bezopasnost′ [The Digital Generation of Russia: Competence and Safety]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2017. 375 p. (in Russian).
  16. George M. J., Odgers C. L. Seven fears and the science of how mobile technologies may be infl uencing adolescents in the digital age. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2015, vol. 10, iss. 6, pp. 832–851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615596788
  17. Giedd J. N. The digital revolution and adolescent brain evolution. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2012, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 101–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.06.002
  18. Issa T., Isaias P. Internet factors infl uencing generations Y and Z in Australia and Portugal: A practical study. Information Processing & Management. 2016, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 592–617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.12.006
  19. Wilmer H. H., Sherman L. E., Chein J. M. Smartphones and Cognition: A Review of Research Exploring the Links between Mobile Technology Habits and Cognitive Functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, vol. 8, article 605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00605
  20. Nechaev V. D., Durneva E. E. “Digital generation”: psychological and pedagogical research of the problem. Pedagogics, 2016, no. 1, pp. 36–45 (in Russian).
  21. Rubtsova O. V. Digital Media as a New Means of Mediation (Part One). Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2019, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 117–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150312 (in Russian).
  22. Rubtsova O.V. Digital technologies as a new means of mediation (Article two). Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2019, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 100–108 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150410
  23. Martsinkovskaya T. D. Informational socialization of adolescents. Obrazovatelnaya politika [Educational Policy], 2010, no. 4 (42), pp. 30–35 (in Russian).
  24. Simakova S. I. Visualization in the media: forced necessity or objective reality? Vestnik of Samara University. History, Pedagogy, Philology, 2017, vol. 23, no. 1.2, pp. 135–140 (in Russian).
  25. Maslenkova N. A. Web 2.0 Reader: Reader’s Perception in the Context of New Media. In: Kozhemyakin E. A., Polonskiy A. V., Khodeev A. G., eds. Diskurs sovremennykh massmedia v perspektive teorii, sotsial′noy praktiki i obrazovaniya [Discourse of Contemporary Mass Media in the Perspective of Theory, Social Practice and Education: Collection of Scientifi c Works]. Belgorod, KONSTANTA Publ., 2014, pp. 301–308 (in Russian).
  26. Orlova O. V., Titova V. N. Educational Challenges of the New Generation: Gamifi cation of the Reading Process as a Way of Organizing Textual Activity (on the Example of the USATODAY Project). Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, iss. 7 (172), pp. 76–80 (in Russian).
  27. Tenkhunen P. Yu., Eliseeva Yu. A. Features of Perception of Educational Information by Modern Students: The Potential of Visual Conceptualization. Integration of Education, 2015, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 28–34 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.081.019.201504.028
  28. Voiskounsky A. E. The Internet as a space of knowledge: Psychological aspects of hypertext structures. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2017, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 7–20 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2017060401
  29. Schpilova G. G., Anikina M. E., Pushkaryova D. A., Ermoshkina T. A., Iskakov D. Z., Kobzev M. V. Perception of Long Reads by Digital Natives. Mediascope, 2016, no. 1. Available at: http://mediascope.ru/?q=node/2089 (accessed 27 December 2019) (in Russian).
  30. Chun Ch., Dudoit K., Fujihara Sh., Gerschenson M., Kennedy A., Koanui B., Ogata V., Stearns J. Teaching Generation Z at the University of Hawai’i. Available at: https://www.hawaii.edu/ovppp/Leaders/files/2015- 2016-Projects/PELP_GenZ_ PaperV.6.0-5.4.16.pdf (accessed 10 August 2019).
  31. Frumkin K. G. Clip thinking and the fate of linear text Ineternum (Ineternum), 2010, no. 1, pp. 26–36. Available at: http://nounivers.narod.ru/pub/kf_clip.htm (accessed 19 September 2019) (in Russian).
  32. Staritsyna O. A. Mozaic thinking vs education. Who is to blame and what to do? Azimuth of Scientifi c Research: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2018, vol. 7, no. 2 (23), pp. 270–274 (in Russian).
  33. Romashina E. Yu., Teterina I. I. The development of teenagers thinking in modern information space: a pilot study. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2014, no. 2. Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=12749 (accessed 21 August 2020) (in Russian).
  34. Gorobets T. N., Kovalev V. V. “Clip thinking” as a refl ection of perceptual processes and sensory memory. The World of Psychology, 2015, no. 2 (82), pp. 94–100 (in Russian).
  35. Semenovskikh T. V. “Clip thinking” is a modern phenomenon. Optimal′nye kommunikatsii: epistemologicheskiy resurs Akademii mediaindustrii i kafedry teorii i praktiki obshchestvennoy svyaznosti RGGU (Optimal Communications: Epistemology Resource of the Academy of Media Industry and the Department of Theory and Practice of Public Connectivity of the Russian State University for the Humanities). Available at: http://jarki.ru/wpress/2013/02/18/3208 (accessed 30 April 2019) (in Russian).
  36. Polyakov S. D., Belozerova L. A., Vershinina V. V., Danilov S. V., Krivtsova N. S. “Clip thinking” among High School and University Students: Research Experience. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2019, no. 4, pp. 126–143 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2019.04.126
  37. Small G., Worgan G. Brain Online: Man in the Internet Age. Trans. from Engl. by B. Kozlovskiy. Moscow, CoLibri Publ., 2011. 349 p. (in Russian).
  38. Loh K. K., Kanai R. How has the internet reshaped human cognition. The Neuroscientist, 2015, vol. 22, iss. 5, pp. 506–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858415595005
  39. Wegner D. M., Erber R., Raymond P. Transactive Memory in Close Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 923–929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.923
  40. Sparrow B., Liu J., Wenger D. M. Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 2011, vol. 333, iss. 6043, pp. 776–778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
  41. Sapa A. V. Generation Z – the generation of the FSES era. Innovative Projects and Programs in Education, 2014, no. 2, pp. 24–30 (in Russian).
  42. Falikman M. V. Metodologiya kostruktivizma v psikhologii poznaniya [Methodology of constructivism in the psychology of cognition]. In: Asmolov A., total ed. Obilis in mobili: lichnost′ v epokhu peremen [Obilis in Mobili: Personality in an Era of Change]. Moscow, RS Publishing House, 2018, pp. 199–212 (in Russian).
  43. Praslov M. S. Psychological features of the representatives of the digital generation. The Collection of Humanitarian Studies, 2016, no. 3(3). Available at: http://j-chr.com/ru/ site/journal/10/article/59 (accessed 17 April 2020) (in Russian).
  44. Soldatova G., Trifonova A. Media multitasking: is it worth worrying? Deti v informatsionnom obshchestve [Children in the Information Society], 2017, no. 3 (28), pp. 24–37 (in Russian)
  45. Ophir E., Nass C., Wagner A. D., Pozner M. I. Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academyof Sciences, 2009, vol. 106, no. 37, pp. 15583‒15587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106. Available at: http://www.pnas.org/content/106/37/15583.full (accessed 15 May 2019).
  46. Moisala M., Salmela V., Hietajärvi L., Solo E., Carlson S., Salonen O. Media multitasking is associated with distractibility and increased prefrontal activity in adolescents and young adults. Neuroimage, 2016, vol. 134, pp. 113–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.011
  47. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 134–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
  48. Uncapher M. R., Wagner A. D. Minds and brains of media multitaskers: Current fi ndings and future directions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, vol. 115, no. 40, pp. 9889–9896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611612115
  49. Kuznetsova E. V., Reser T. M. Clip thinking impact on the changing of educational technologies in high school. Akmeologiya professional′nogo obrazovaniya [Akmeology of Vocational Education: Materials of the 14th All-Russian Scientifi c and Practical Conference]. Ekaterinburg, Izdatel'stvo Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo proffessional'no-pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2018, pp. 367–370 (in Russian).
Full text (in Russian):
download
(downloads: 132)
Short text (in English):
download
(downloads: 26)
© 2013-2024 Website design. Saratov State University