Cite this article as:

Klenova M. A. Conditions for Overcoming Discriminatory Affirmations in Modern Society. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2020, vol. 9, iss. 4, pp. 331-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-4-331-337


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
UDC: 
316.62
Language: 
Russian

Conditions for Overcoming Discriminatory Affirmations in Modern Society

Abstract: 

The relevance of the study is conditioned by the necessity for formation of theoretical and practical knowledge and technologies that allow to analyze the conditions for overcoming discriminatory affirmations in modern society. The purpose of the research presented in the article is to analyze systematically the conditions for overcoming discriminatory affirmations in modern society. Hypothesis of the study suggests the assumption that in order to identify the conditions for overcoming discriminatory affirmations, a comprehensive study of the conditions of formation is necessary, followed by a search for ways of their transformation. We established that the conditions for formation of discriminatory affirmations include cultural and historical foundations, social environment, mass media, state policy, etc. The following conditions are emphasized: termination of conflict interaction, search for common or similar points of contact of opponents, decrease in the intensity of negative emotions, provision of effective discussion of the problem and choice of an optimal conflict resolution strategy based on the formed discriminatory affirmations. Narrowing the subject field of the study of triggering events, and as a consequence – overcoming discriminatory affirmations through behavior of a person in a conflict situation, will allow us to distinguish two groups: internal and external formation conditions and implementation of discriminatory attitudes. Internal conditions include prejudices, or stereotypes of a cognitive or emotional level, and external ones are real actions in interaction with an outgroup to implement prejudices already formed. A hierarchical system of conditions for overcoming discriminatory affirmations has been formulated, including four main components, where the first link is the formation of sociocultural identity, as an understanding and value of belonging to one’s own group; fixation of socio-cultural competence as a system of knowledge and ideas about the “Others”; formation of sociocultural values in relation to “others”; formation of sociocultural tolerance, which includes identity, competence and sociocultural values.

References
  1. Barabanshchikov V. A. Systems approach in structure of psychological cognition. Methodology and History of Psychology, 2007, vol. 2, iss. 1, pp. 86–99 (in Russian).
  2. Klenova M. A. Characteristics of objects of discrimination in youth environment. 21 century: fundamental science and technology. XVIII: Proceedings of the Conference. North Charleston, 24–25 December 2018. Morrisvill, NC, USA, Lulu Press, 2018, pp. 115–117 (in Russian).
  3. Klenova M. A. Ethnic Specifi city of Discriminatory Attitudes. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.). Ser. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2019, vol. 8, iss. 2, pp. 157–162 (in Russian).  DOI:  https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2019- 8-2-157-162
  4. Shamionov R. M., Grigor’yeva M. V. Interconnection between discriminatory attitudes of an individual and socio-demographic characteristics, socio-political and socio-economic preferences. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2018, vol. 7, iss. 4, pp. 326–332 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi. org/10.18500/2304-9790-2018-7-4-327-332
  5. Bocharova E. E. Content Characteristics of the “Subject Field” of Discriminatory Attitudes. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogcs, 2018, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 308–322 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2019-16-3-359-376
  6. Bocharova E. E. “Physical appearance of Other” in the structure of discrimination sets of personality. In: P. N. Ermakova, V. A. Labunskiy, G. V. Serikova, total eds. Vneshniy oblik v razlichnykh kontekstakh vzaimodeystviya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Rostov on Don, Kredo Publ., 2019, pp. 250–252 (in Russian).
  7. Beskova T. V. Features of perception by subjects of gender and age discrimination settings in relation to them. Human capital, 2019, no. 12 (132), pp. 221–228 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2019.12.24
  8. Usova N. V. Content characteristics of discrimination equipment by age. The Emissia. Offl ine letters, 2018, no. 8. Available at: http://www.emissia.org/offl ine/2018/2643. htm (accessed 2 June 2020) (in Russian).
  9. Tarasova L. E. Relationship of the transpersonal perspective with discriminatory attitudes. Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P. F. Lesgafta, 2020, no. 3 (181), pp. 535–540 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.34835/issn.2308-1961.2020.3
  10. Grigoryeva M. V. Personality’s discriminative attitudes and behavior in confl ict. Strakhov readings. Collection of scientifi c papers. Saratov, 2018, no. 26, pp. 52–56 (in Russian).
  11. Grigoryeva M. V. Theoretical Analysis of the Problem of Realization of Discriminatory Attitudes of the Person in Behavior. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2018, vol. 18, iss. 3, pp. 305–310. (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2018-18-3-305-31012
  12. Martsinkovskaya T. D., Kiseleva E. A. Socialization and acculturation in the transitive space. Psychologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological Studies]. 2018, vol. 11, iss. 62, p. 10. Available at: http://psystudy.ru (accessed 2 June 2020) (in Russian).
  13. Konstantinov V. V. Strategies of social and psychological adaptation of migrants. Scientifi c Notes: The online academic journal of Kursk State University, 2018, no. 2 (46), pp. 294–304. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/strategii-sotsialno-psihologicheskoy-a... (accessed 12 June 2020) (in Russian).
  14. Apollonov I. A., Berberyan A. S. The problem of personalagency within the space of socio-cultural dominants. SouthRussian Journal of Social Sciences, 2018, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 47–57 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-19-3- 47-57
  15. Khukhlayev O. E., Aleksandrova E. A., Gritsenko V. V., Konstantinov V. V., Kuznetsov I. M., Pavlova O. S., Ryzhova S. V., Shorokhova V. A. Religious Group Identifi cation and Ethno-National Attitudes in Buddhist, Muslim and Orthodox Youth. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2019, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 71–82 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150308
  16. Kolomiychenko L. V., Gruzdeva I. V. Sociocultural competence: its culturological aspect, essence, approaches to the defi nition. Modern problems of science and education, 2015, no. 1–1, p. 1585. Available at: https://www.scienceeducation.ru/ru/article/view?id=19433 (accessed 12 June 2020) (in Russian).
  17. Zaredinova E. R. Theoretical understanding of the concept of «socio-cultural values». Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovanija [Problems of modern teacher education], 2015, no. 47–1, pp. 86–94 (in Russian).
  18. Puzikov V. G., Timofeyev A. F. Sociocultural tolerance as a factor of intercivilizational communication. Science of the Person: Humanitarian Researches, 2009, no. 4. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsiokulturnaya-tolerantnost-kak-vazh... (accessed 9 June 2020) (in Russian).
Full text (in Russian):
(downloads: 96)
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 53)