Cite this article as:
Elovskayа S. V., Chernyaeva T. N. Interactive Training in Higher Education. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2019, vol. 8, iss. 1, pp. 83-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2019-8-1-83-87
Interactive Training in Higher Education
The necessity of using interactive learning in the higher education system is determined. The content of the concepts “interactive learning”, “interactive forms and teaching methods” has been analyzed. The features of the use of interactive forms and teaching methods in the educational process of the university are described. The hypothesis of the research was the assumption that through the use of interactive learning a higher level of development of logical thinking is achieved. The main interactive teaching methods have been identified, which imply an appeal to the logical methods of teaching, reflecting the logical operations of thinking, analysis, ..., generalization. Interactive learning allows synthesizing disparate knowledge from different branches of scientific thought, highlighting the main and most important information, being able to lead the discussion, express their point of view. Through the prism of the system, competence, activity, personality-oriented, axiological approaches, the organizational forms of teaching at the university (interactive lectures, seminars) are analyzed. The study suggests that interactive learning in higher education contributes to the achievement of interdisciplinary and metadisciplinary results that complies with the current Federal State educational standards of higher education. The main research ideas can be used in the organization of the educational process of higher education, as well as in solving practical issues of improving the Russian education system.
1. Sukhanova V. I. Kompetentnostnyy podkhod v obrazovanii: zadachi pedagogicheskoy deyatel’nosti uchitelya nachal’noy shkoly po vvedeniyu FGOS [Competence Approach at Education: Tasks of School Teacher’s Pedagogical Activity for Establishment of FSES]. Available at: http://pandia.ru/text/77/275/20526.php (accessed 10 October 2018) (in Russian).
2. Stupina S. B. Tehnologii interaktivnogo obuchenijа v vysshei shkole: ucheb.-metod. posobie [Interactive Higher School Education Technologies]. Saratov, 2009. 52 p. (in Russian).
3. Protasova O. A. Model’ vzaimodeistviyа organizacionnyh form tvorcheskogo obucheniyа studentov-fi lologov grammaticheskim jаvlenijаm angliiskogo yаzyka (pedagogicheskii vuz) [Model of interaction of organizational forms of creative teaching English grammar phenomena to philology students (pedagogical university)]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Pedag.). Michurinsk, 2006. 214 p. (in Russian).
4. Harlamov I. F. Pedagogika [Pedagogy]. Moscow, 1990. pp. 231–232 (in Russian).
5. Dubrovina L. A. System Approach at Organizing of Interaction between Education Subyects. Psikhologiya obucheniya [Educational Psychology], 2017, no. 2, pp. 5–11 (in Russian).
6. Kamaleeva A. R. Sistemnyy podkhod v pedagogi ke (System Approach in Pedagogy). Available at: http://npo.tspu.edu.ru/files/npo/PDF/articles/kamaleyeva_a._r._13_23_3_9... (accessed 10 October 2018) (in Russian).
7. Chutorskoy A. B. Deyatel’noct’ kak soderzhanie obrazovaniya. Narodnoe obrazovanie [National Education], 2003, no. 8, pp. 107–114 (in Russian).
8. Luk’yanova M. I. Formation of Teacher’s Axiological Attitude to Personally-Oriented Education at Process of Innovative Activity. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya [Fundamental Research], 2014, no. 11 (pt. 3), pp. 621–626 (in Russian).
9. Aksiologicheskiy podkhod v obrazovanii: teoriya i praktika: mezhdunar. sb. nauch. tr. [Axiological Approach in Education: Theory and Praxis: International Collection of Scientifi c papers]. By total ed. M. I. Luk’yanova, E. A. Lodatko. Cherkassy, Ulyanovsk, 2013. 504 p. (in Russian).
10. Aktivnye i interaktivnye obrazovatel’nye tehnologii (formy provedeniyа zanyаtii) v vysshei shkole: ucheb. posobie [Active and interactive educational technologies (forms of classes) in higher education]. Compliter T. G. Mukhina. N. Novgorod, 2013. 97 p. (in Russian).
11. Goncharova N. A. Logicheskii podhod k formirovaniyu filologicheskoi kompetencii studentov magistratury pedagogicheskih vuzov (na materiale nacional’nyh variantov angliiskogo yаzyka) [A logical approach to the formation of the philological competence of graduate students of pedagogical universities (on the material of the national variants of the English language]. Thesis. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Pedag.). Yaroslavl’, 2011. 47 p. (in Russian).
12. Berdichevskiy A. L. Optimizacijа sistemy obucheniyа inostrannomu yаzyku v pedagogicheskom vuze [Optimization of a foreign language teaching system in a pedagogical university]. Moscow, 1989. 101 p. (in Russian).
13. Elovskayа S. V. The use of interactive educational technologies in teaching a foreign language at the university. Vestn. Tambov. un-ta, Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki [Vestn. Tambov. un-ta, Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki], 2018, vol. 23. no. 176, pp. 39‒45 (in Russian).
14. Gotlan Yu. A. O roli interaktivnogo obucheniyа v podgotovke bakalavra [On the role of interactive education in the training of bachelor]. GAUDEAMUS IGITUR. Tomsk, 2015, no. 3, pp. 20‒22 (in Russian).
15. Chernilevskiy D. V. Didakticheskie tehnologii v vysshei shkole: ucheb. posobie dlyа vuzov [Didactic technology in higher school]. Moscow, 2002. 437 p. (in Russian).
