Cite this article as:

Nevsky E. V. Analysis of Relationship between Commitment to Civic Engagement and Socio-Psychological Characteristics of Students. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2020, vol. 9, iss. 4, pp. 377-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-4-377-384


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
UDC: 
316.6
Language: 
Russian

Analysis of Relationship between Commitment to Civic Engagement and Socio-Psychological Characteristics of Students

Abstract: 

The purpose of the study presented in the article is to identify the relationship between commitment to civic engagement and sociopsychological characteristics of the individual. The study was carried out on a sample of young students (N = 110) aged 17 to 29 years (M = 23, SD = 3.98), 29% of men and 71% of women. The following methodological tools were used: a questionnaire aimed at fixing the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents; a questionnaire, including a scale of self-assessment of social activity and forms of its manifestation (R. M. Shamionov, I. V. Arendachuk, E. E. Bocharova, etc.); questions aimed at self-assessment of trust in the government institution in the possibility of realizing one’s own rights and freedoms; “Personal value questionnaire” by S. Schwartz (PVQ-R2) to study the expression of individual values. Presumably, there is a relationship between the severity of civil society and socio-political forms of activity, trust in institutional sources and values of openness to change. We discovered that the most preferred forms of social activity of young people are leisure, Internet network, spiritual and educational development. Young people are more likely to express confidence in their relatives or friends, and various Internet sources when exercising their rights and freedoms. We demonstrated that participation of young people in activities aimed at transforming society and expressing their own and collective civic position on issues of public life expands the possibilities of achieving personal professional, career and economic goals, as well as the realization of their cultural, national, religious interests, subject to the manifestation of trust in various governing institutions that implement the functions of ensuring the rights and freedoms of a person. Realization of civic activity is associated with desire for novelty and changes in society, on the one hand, the desire for change leads to generation of civic activity associated with transformation of society on the other hand. The value of “stimulation” is a predictor of civic activity. The study of this problem can be applied in work with young people in public municipal organizations, schools, institutes.

References
  1. Shamionov R. M. Social Activity of Personality and Groups: Defi nition, Structure and Mechanisms. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2018, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 379–394 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2018-15-4-379-394
  2. Bocharova E. E. Structural Organization of Regulatory Factors of Various Forms of Social Activity of Young People. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2018, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 383–389 (in Russian).
  3. Grigoryeva M. V. Components of a person’s social activity in situations of uncertainty and risk. World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 2019, no. 4, vol. 7, pp. 36–44 (in Russian).
  4. Arendachuk I. V. Value-based meaningful Characteristics of Social Activity of Youth, Depending on the Forms of its Manifestation. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2018, vol. 18, iss. 4, pp. 425–432 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2018-18-4-425-432
  5. Zagranichny A. I. The situational and worldview factors in the social and political involvement of the youth. Society: sociology, psychology, pedagogics, 2018. iss. 9, pp. 67–71 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2018.9.13
  6. Klenova M. A. Grazhdanskaya i social’no-politicheskaya aktivnost’: differenciaciya ponyatiy [Civil and Sociopolitical Activity: Differentiation of Concepts]. In: Gaman-Golutvina O. V., Smorgunov A. V., Timofeeva L. N., eds. Traektorii politicheskogo razvitiya Rossii: instituty, proekty, aktory: materialy vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii RAPN s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Moskovskiy pedagogicheskiy gosudarstvenny universitet [Traectories of Russia’s political development: institutions, projects, actors: materials of the all-Russian scientifi c conference of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences with international participation]. Moscow, MGPU Publ., 2019, pp. 195–196 (in Russian).
  7. Usova N. V. Determinants of Socio-political Activity of Contemporary Youth. Russian Psychological Journal, 2019, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 164–188 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2019.2.9
  8. Nevsky E. V Activity of Youth in the Social and Political Sphere. Shamionov R. M., total eds. Strakhov readings, Saratov, 2019, no. 27, pp. 281–288 (in Russian).
  9. Nikitina B. A. Institutionalization of Civic Engagement in Modern Russian Society: Theoretical and Practical Aspects. In: Teoriya i praktika razvitiya institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Samarskoy oblasti: materialy pervoy regional’noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Theory and practice of the development of civil society institutions in the Samara region. Materials of the fi rst regional scientifi c and practical conference], Samara, Samarskaya regional’naya obshchestvennaya organizatsiya «Istoriko-eko-kul’turnaya associatsiya «Povolzh’e», 2015, pp. 27–37 (in Russian).
  10. Kalandarishvili Z. N. Factors infl uencing the process of structuring a person’s legal activeness as an important aspect of the development of the contemporary Russian civil society. Leningradskiy Juridical Journal, 2011, no. 1(23), pp. 48–58 (in Russian).
  11. Berezkina O. E., Korosteleva T. V. Factors of formation of civil activity of youth. Sports and Pedagogical Education, 2018, no. 2, pp. 59–62 (in Russian).
  12. Mikhailova O. В. Civic patriotism as basis for axiological and motivational activity of personality involved in innovative activity. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2013, no. 3, pp. 14–21 (in Russian).
  13. Volkova N. V., Guseva L. A. Civic engagement as a mirror of the political, spiritual and cultural values of the society. Modern problems of science and education. Surgery, 2013, no. 5, pp. 701–707 (in Russian).
  14. Kilimova L. V. Practices of civil society through the prisma of social activity of the personality. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics, Sociology and Managment, 2017, vol. 7, no. 4 (25), pp. 245–254 (in Russian).
  15. Vorontsova T. N., Yudina E. V. Sociocultural specifi city of civic engagement. Bulletin of the South Russian State Technical University (NPI). Series Socio-economic sciences, 2017, no. 1, pp. 97–101 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17213/2075-2067-2017-1-97-101
  16. Maximova S. G. Civic Consciousness, Civic Initiatives and Social Activity of the Population as a Basis for the Formation of Civil Society in Modern Russia. Bulletin of the Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University. Series no. 3. Humanities and social sciences, 2015, iss. 1, pp. 116 –131 (in Russian).
  17. Tarasov Yu. B., Khudik V. A. Forming of civil activity realized in socially useful work in students. World of Science, Culture, Education, 2014, no. 6 (49), pp. 146–148 (in Russian).
  18. Kirdiashkin I. V. Historical constants of social and political activites of the modern young people. Tomsk State University Journal, 2007, no. 303, pp. 80–85 (in Russian).
  19. Trotsuk I. V., Sokhadz K. G. Social activity of the youth: approaches to the assessment of forms, motives and factors in the contemporary russian society. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 2014, no. 4, pp. 58–74 (in Russian).
  20. Schwartz Sh., Butenko T. P., Sedova D. S., Lipatova A. S. Refi ned theory of basic individual values: application in Russia. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2012, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 43–70 (in Russian).
Full text (in Russian):
(downloads: 92)
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 41)