Cite this article as:
Михайлина М. Ю. Psychological Well-Being of Subjects of the Educational Process in the Context of Gender Features of Its Organization. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2018, vol. 7, iss. 3, pp. 212-?. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2018-7-3-212-219
Psychological Well-Being of Subjects of the Educational Process in the Context of Gender Features of Its Organization
The purpose of the study presented in the article is comparative analysis of level characteristics of subjectively perceived psychological well-being of the participants in the educational process in mono- and heterogenous educational space. It is supposed that there is interrelation between gender factors incorporated in a certain model of educational environment and subjective evaluation of psychological security of participants of educational process. The study was carried out on a sample of representatives of educational institutions with different models of educational process organization, i.e. the Cadet School; the school that implements separate parallel learning; Gymnasium (n = 437): students (n = 251, age 13–16 years, 64% boys), parents of students (n = 114, 86% mothers), teachers (n = 72, 92% women) using the following psycho-diagnostic tools: “Psychological diagnostics of school educational environment safety” (I. A. Baeva, modified by M. Yu. Mikhaylina), the author’s questionnaire. It has been established that in the mixed-learning model based on the heterogender principle, the adaptive level of subjective well-being of students is more common than in the other two models, which indicates more complex adaptive strategies that the students have learned. Students of the Cadet classes, united by the monogender principle, have a lower level of subjective well-being. Intermediate results were obtained in the classes of separate parallel learning, which are a kind of heterogeneous organization of the educational space. The comparative analysis of teacher and parent positions data concerning various models of training are given in the study. The practical importance of the study is conditioned by possibility of using its results in optimizing educational process at schools with different models of educational environment, depending on gender characteristics of its organization.
1. Ar’es F. Rebenok i semeynaya zhizn’ pri starom poryadke [Child and Family Life during Old Regime]. Ekaterinburg, 1999. 415 p. (in Russian).
2. Obukhova L. F. Vozrastnaya psikhologiya [Age Psychology]. Moscow, 2011. 460 p. (in Russian).
3. Kon I. S. Rebenok i obshchestvo [Child and Society]. Moscow, 2003. 336 p. (in Russian).
4. Baeva I. A., Laktionova E. B. Opredelenie pokazateley ekspertizy psikhologicheskoy bezopasnosti obrazovatel’noy sredy (Defi nition of Indexes of Expertise of Psychological Safety of educational Environment). Ekspertiza psikhologicheskoy bezopasnosti obrazovatel’noy sredy: inform.- metod. byulleten’ (Expertise of Psychological Safety of Educational Environment: Informational-methodical bulletin). Moscow, 2009, no. 2. Available at: http://psyjournals.ru/ (accessed 17 January 2018) (in Russian).
5. Burmistrova E. V. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost’ obrazovatel’noy sredy (Psychological Safety of Educa- Акмеология образования 219 tional Environment). Moscow, 2005. Available at: http:// tochkapsy.ru/teksts/burmistrova/b4.ppt (accessed 17 January 2018) (in Russian).
6. Kabachenko T. S. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost’ kak odno iz izmereniy bezopasnosti obshchestva [Psychological Safety as One of Measures of Society Safety]. Akmeologiya [Acmeology], 2002, no. 1, pp. 95–103 (in Russian).
7. Miroshnichenko A. A., Merzlyakova D. R. Regional’naya strategiya sokhraneniya i ukrepleniya psikhologicheskogo zdorov’ya uchastnikov obrazovatel’nykh otnosheniy [Regional Strategy of Saving and Promotion of Health of Participants of Educational Relations]. Psikhologopedagogicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological-Education Studies], 2017, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 44–53 (in Russian). DOI:10.17759/psyedu.2017090105
8. Slobodchikov V. I. O ponyatii obrazovatel’noy sredy v kontseptsii razvivayushchego obrazovaniya [About Notion of Educational Environment in Concept of Developing Education]. Moscow, 2000. 230 p. (in Russian).
9. Shamionov R. M. Psikhologiya sub”ektivnogo blagopoluchiya lichnosti [Psychology of Personality’s Subjective Well-Being]. Saratov, 2004. 180 p. (in Russian).
10. Baeva I. A., Shakhova L. I. Formirovanie i podderzhka sostoyaniya psikhologicheskoy bezopasnosti uchashchikhsya kadetskikh klassov [Formation and Support of Psychological Safety Station by Pupils of Cadet Classes]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological-Education Studies], 2016, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 91–101 (in Russian). DOI:10.17759/psyedu.2016080410
11. Bogomyagkova O. N. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost’ obrazovatel’nogo prostranstva vuza [Psychological Security Educational Space of the University]. Vestnik Perm. gos. gum.-ped. un-ta. Ser. 1. Psikhologicheskie i pedagogicheskie nauki [Vestnik PSHPU. Ser. 1. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences], 2015, iss. 1, pp. 60–67 (in Russian).
12. Pazukhina S. V. Metody otsenki psikhologicheskoy bezopasnosti obrazovatel’noy sredy uchastnikami pedagogicheskogo protsessa [Methods of Valuation of Psychological Safety of Educational Environment by Participants of Teaching Process]. In: Psikhologicheskoe soprovozhdenie bezopasnosti obrazovatel’noy sredy shkoly v usloviyakh vnedreniya novykh obrazovatel’nykh i professional’nykh standartov: sb. nauch. st. [Psychological Escort of Safety of School Educational Environment in Conditions of Implementation of New Educational and Professional Standards: collection of scientifi c articles], Moscow, 2015, pp. 31–36 (in Russian).
13. Schurtz H. Alterklassen und Männerbünde. Berlin, 1902. 458 p. (in German).
14. Steward F. H. Fundamentals of Age-Group Systems. New York, 1977. 381 p.
15. Mikhaylin V. Yu. Tropa zverinykh slov. Prostranstvenno orientirovannye kul’turnye kody v indoevropeyskoy traditsii [Path of Animals’ Words. Space-Oriented Cultural Codes at Indian-European Tradition]. Moscow, 2005. 540 p. (in Russian).
